Nowadays, people are much involved in electronic gadgets. There might be both pros and cons of the usage.
Is this any strategy?
Yes, of course, it's like a method or plan chosen to bring out the desired goal of the company. If we get anything free of charge there comes the problem. We ourselves digging a graveyard to fell into.
"Spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings and imaginations," said Wordsworth. But in today's scenario lack of creativity and people were not supposed to share their thoughts and ideas. Even the art of culture getting collapsed to this electronic engagement.
For example, in a multilingual classroom, the teacher finds difficult to handle the students. The varieties of language play a vital role in that forum. The facilitator finds difficult to reach the target language. In that, language is the medium in and around the world. Likewise, gadgets should be the intermediate it cannot influence one over the other.
The word independence is the very word that false in today's context. Dependence is a reality. In my point of view, knowledge is not independent. If one is not interconnected they cannot get the transformation into ideas
" You are me, and I am you"
We are living in a connected world, how come one can live an independent human in the digital era. Behaviourism was the major flaw of the engagement. Things should stimulate the ideas of one's own but not the mannerism.
Comments